Drawing for BLACK SOY NECTAR

USPTO serial 79253639

BLACK SOY NECTAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 6039143Status 739Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 28, 2020
Examiner
MACFARLANE, JAMES W
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with BLACK SOY NECTAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mainak H. Mehta

Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics [ ; non-medicated soaps; cosmetic soaps; detergents for household use; dentifrices; perfumery; incense; fragrances; breath freshening preparations for personal hygiene; false nails; false eyelashes; cotton wool for cosmetic purposes; fabric softeners for laundry use; adhesives for affixing false eyelashes; abrasive paper; cotton swabs for cosmetic purposes ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2026ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 17, 2026NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2026C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 10, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 28, 2026ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2025REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2020FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 8, 2020XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 4, 2020XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jul 28, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 28, 2020R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 11, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 7, 2020GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 22, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2020OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 22, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 5, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 27, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 21, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 21, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 21, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 8, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 19, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 1, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 1, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 25, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 24, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 16, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 15, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2019LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance