Drawing for OMNI DHD SEEING AS NATURE INTENDED

USPTO serial 79253723

OMNI DHD SEEING AS NATURE INTENDED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RHIM, ANDREW
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with OMNI DHD SEEING AS NATURE INTENDED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles Ho

Charles Ho BYIP LTD.5465 Legacy Drive, Suite 650Plano, TX 75024UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Monitors being computer hardware; computer programs, recorded for use in operating video recorders and monitors used in endoscopic surgery; video recorders; data processing apparatus; optical apparatus and instruments, namely, endoscopic cameras; audio and video receivers; stereoscopic apparatus, namely, stereoscopic cameras; the aforesaid goods not relating to the field of capsule endoscopy and not relating to capsule endoscopesACTIVE—
010Surgical apparatus and instruments; medical apparatus and instruments, namely, endoscopes for use in minimal invasive surgery; endoscopy cameras for medical purposes; testing apparatus for medical purposes, namely, for diagnostic testing of gastrointestinal diseases; the aforesaid goods not relating to the field of capsule endoscopy and not relating to capsule endoscopesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 7, 2024FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 21, 2023FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 21, 2023FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 22, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 21, 2022MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 21, 2022ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 8, 2022GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2022GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 17, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 17, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 15, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 23, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 4, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 4, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 13, 2020RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 29, 2020OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 12, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 12, 2020OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 9, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 29, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 6, 2020LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW—
Jan 31, 2020LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 18, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 30, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 26, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 29, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 28, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 21, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 20, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 13, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 12, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance