USPTO serial 79254266
DADI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DADI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Technological services and research and design relating thereto; design and development of computer hardware and software; computer consultancy services; computer network services; computer programming services; information technology services; research and development services; engineering services; hosting platforms on the Internet; platform as a service [PaaS]; software as a service [Saas]; cloud computing; electronic storage of files, documents and images; temporary electronic storage of information; development of new technology for others; design and development of networks; design and development of information and communications technology; software design; design and development of operating software for cloud computing networks; building and maintaining websites; cloud hosting provider services; hosting of transaction platforms on the Internet; hosting of e-commerce platforms on the Internet; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software development tools; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for accessing and using a cloud computing network; cloud computing services in relation to virtual computer systems; application service provider [ASP] services, namely, hosting computer software applications of others; configuration of computer systems and networks; computer software support services; programming of software for Internet platforms; consulting in the field of cloud computing networks and applications; computer technology consultancy; computer security consultancy; internet security consultancy; encryption, decryption and authentication of information, messages and data; authentication, issuance and validation of digital certificates; troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; information, advisory and consultancy services relating to the aforesaid services, all of the aforesaid services also provided online via a database or the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 22, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 19, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |