Drawing for MIGLO

USPTO serial 79254354

MIGLO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIGLO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CYNTHIA R ADWERE

CYNTHIA R ADWERE LAW OFFICE OF CYNTHIA R ADWERE2625 MIDDLEFIELD ROAD #360PALO ALTO, CA 94306UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic, electro technical and electromagnetic modules, parts, and components therefor, namely, integrated circuits; computer and semiconductor chips; wireless transmitters and receivers; wireless communication devices for data or audio transmission; electronic sensors for sensing and measuring light, pressure, touch, gravity, movement, acceleration, position, velocity, moisture, temperature, ph, sound, and electronic signals; ear buds; wearable computers worn on the wrist; wearable digital electronic devices in the form of a wristwatch, wrist band and bangle, namely, a wearable digital electronic device comprised primarily of software and a wrist band mounted touchscreen and also featuring a wrist watch for the wireless receipt, storage and transmission of data and messages, and for keeping track of and managing personal informationABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Apr 30, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 3, 2023FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 15, 2022FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 15, 2022FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 15, 2021MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 15, 2021ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Dec 15, 2021OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 15, 2021OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Sep 5, 2020OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 29, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 19, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 19, 2020OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 10, 2020OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 4, 2020OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Aug 4, 2020OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Feb 5, 2020ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 4, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 4, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 31, 2020GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 15, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2020OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Dec 26, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 26, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 21, 2019NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 20, 2019PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2019PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2019MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 15, 2019ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 8, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 25, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 3, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 3, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 10, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 9, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 18, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance