Drawing for LASC

USPTO serial 79254547

LASC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5964080Status 707Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 21, 2020
Examiner
RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with LASC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Molly T. Eichten

Molly T. Eichten Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd.8300 Norman Center DriveSuite 1000Minneapolis, MN 55437-1060

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007[ Mineworking machines; truck mills for mining; machines for geoexploration, mining and beneficiation, namely, drills for the mining industry, mining bits, earth moving machines, mine shearers, mine borers, mine blasters being sand-blasting apparatus, mine excavators, and mining drill sharpeners; mine borers; pile-extractors for mines; mine sundries removing machines; material handling machines, namely, conveyors, conveyor belt lines, conveyor systems comprised of hydraulic conveyors, weighbelt feeders, elevators, and lifting work platforms ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009Navigation apparatus for mining machinery and vehicles; electronic navigating and positioning apparatus and instrument; measuring apparatus, namely, bulk solids flow measurement systems comprised of flow meters and pressure sensors; detectors, namely, electronic equipment for mine detection; surveying machines and instruments; surveying and mapping apparatus, namely, terrestrial and airborne laser scanning equipment in the nature of laser scanners, X-ray fluorescence analyzers and aerial photogrammetry equipment in the nature of cameras and optical scanners; 3D scannersACTIVE—
042Surveying; [ engineer surveying; ] geological surveying [ ; engineering drawing; design and development of multi-media products; scientific research; scientific laboratory services; research and development of new products for others; mapmaking services ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2026NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 202671.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 7, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 3, 2026ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 2, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2026ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2025REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2020FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 7, 2020XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
May 6, 2020XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Apr 21, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 21, 2020R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 5, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 1, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 16, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 16, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 1, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 30, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 19, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 26, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 8, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 29, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 28, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 27, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 25, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 21, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance