USPTO serial 79254968
INCOTEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INCOTEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Regulating apparatus, electric; camcorders; cash registers; chargers for electric batteries; counters; converters, electric; current rectifiers; steering apparatus, automatic, for vehicles; alarms; data processing apparatus; distribution boards [electricity]; electric light regulators; inverters [electricity]; measuring devices, electric; mobile telephones; cellular phones; navigation apparatus for vehicles [on-board computers]; speed checking apparatus for vehicles; switches, electric; taximeters; tachometers; video screens; weighing apparatus and instruments | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Chandeliers; lamps, electric; ceiling lights; lighting apparatus and installations; lighting apparatus for vehicles; light-emitting diodes [LED] lighting apparatus; diving lights; floor lamps | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 2, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 2, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 6, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 6, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |