USPTO serial 79255062
CTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 11, 2020
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SHENZHEN CANDOR TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
CN
Other trademarks owned by SHENZHEN CANDOR TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
SHENZHEN CANDOR TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
CN
Other trademarks owned by SHENZHEN CANDOR TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
SHENZHEN CANDOR TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
CN
Other trademarks owned by SHENZHEN CANDOR TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joe McKinney Muncy
Joe McKinney Muncy Muncy, Geissler, Olds & Lowe, P.C.4000 Legato Road Suite 310Fairfax, VA 22033UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Fertilizer spreading machines; filtering machines for chemical processing, namely, for the processing of sulfuric acid; oil and gas extraction and mining machines; industrial oil extraction and petroleum refining machines; rare gas extraction machines; oil refining machines; electromechanical machines for chemical industry, namely, for the preparation of glycerol; pharmaceutical production machines | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SHENZHEN CANDOR TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SHENZHEN CANDOR TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by SHENZHEN CANDOR TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named CTS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2026 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 11, 2025 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 11, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 17, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2019 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 2, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |