USPTO serial 79255270
RUBIG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RUBIG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and machine tools for treatment of materials and for manufacturing; coating machines; galvanizing machines; machines for processing metals; metalworking machines; nitriding installations; nitriding machines; plasma nitriding machines; plasma nitriding installations; plasma welding machines; welding apparatus; electric welding machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Machinery installation, maintenance and repair | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Metal treating; welding; metal hardening; surface treatments; firing pottery; ceramic processing; coating by plasma nitriding; heat treatment of metals; heat treatment, coating and plasma nitriding of steel, metal, metal alloys and ceramics (treatment of materials) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 7, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 23, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 1, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2019 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |