Drawing for HELIUM

USPTO serial 79255684

HELIUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KHAN, AHSEN M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HELIUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Abraham Lichy

STREET 222 EAST 68TH STREET222 EAST 68TH STREETNEW YORK, NY 10065

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014jewelry {either delete the wording "articles of" list each article by its common commercial name}; anklets being jewelry {delete the brackets and incorporate the information contained therein into the description}; anklets being jewelry; amulets being jewelry; amulets being jewelry; agate jewelry; agate jewelry; cabochons for making jewelry; brooches being jewelry; bronze jewelry; bracelets made of embroidered textile being jewelry; bracelets being jewelry; beads for making jewelry; jewelry; children's jewelry; charms for jewelry; chains being jewelry; chains being jewelry; ear ornaments in the nature of jewelry; diamond jewelry; diamond jewelry; decorative pins being jewelry; decorative pins being jewelry; decorative brooches being jewelry; decorative brooches being jewelry; custom jewelry; crystal jewelry; crucifixes of precious metal, other than jewelry; costume jewelry; gold jewelry; jewelry boxes of precious metals; jewelry; jewelry; imitation stones for making jewelry; imitation jewelry; jade jewelry; ivory jewelry; jewelry clasps; jewelry chains of precious metal for bracelets; jewelry chains; jewelry caskets; jewelry made from gold; jewelry for women; jewelry for the head; jewelry for men; jewelry for children; jewelry findings; jewelry rings; jewelry presentation boxes; jewelry, precious stones; jewelry, precious and semi-precious stones; jewelry plated with precious metals; jewelry ornaments; jewelry made of silver; jewelry made of plated precious metals; jewelry made of gold; jewelry brooches; jewelry stickpins; jewelry made from gold; jewelry made from silver; jewelry chains of precious metal for bracelets; jewelry caskets of precious metal; jewelry watches; necklaces being jewelry; men's jewelry; pendants being jewelry in Class 14ACTIVE—
035Retail store services for jewelry {describe the type of retail services in more detail}; online wholesale store services featuring jewelry; online retail store services featuring jewelry; online retail store services relating to jewelry; online retail store services relating to jewelry; on-line wholesale store services featuring jewelry; on-line retail store services relating to jewelry; advertising services relating to jewelry in Class 35ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2021FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 7, 2021FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2021FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2020OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 9, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2020OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 5, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 5, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 24, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 24, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 24, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 1, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 2, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 9, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 9, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 8, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance