Drawing for KALEIDO

USPTO serial 79255744

KALEIDO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5999161Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 3, 2020
Examiner
MCBRIDE, CAMERON L
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KALEIDO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John E. Lyhus

John E. Lyhus Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP120 S. LaSalle StreetSuite 2100Chicago, IL 60603

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Robot machines, namely, robotic agricultural seed planting machines, robotic tilling machines for agricultural use, robotic vacuum cleaners for household purposes, robotic dishwashers for household purposes, robotic washing machines for household purposes, robotic pulp making machines, robotic machines for manufacturing semiconductors, robotic corrugated cardboard manufacturing machines, robotic metal forming machines, robotic road construction machines; industrial robots; parts for industrial robotsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
009Humanoid robots with artificial intelligence; computer programs and software for diagnostics, monitoring and data processing of industrial robots; computer software for two or three-dimensional simulation to optimize configuration of industrial robots; computersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 18, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 3, 2025REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2020FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 14, 2020XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 14, 2020XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Jun 3, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 3, 2020R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 17, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 17, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 27, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 13, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 22, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 22, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 22, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 16, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 25, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 7, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 7, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 13, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 12, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 5, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance