USPTO serial 79255894
FUJI SYSTEMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VO, JULIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FUJI SYSTEMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jorge Arciniega
Jorge Arciniega McDermott Will & Emery LLP2049 Century Park East, Suite 3200Los Angeles, CA 90067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical apparatus and instruments, namely, catheters, balloon catheters, endotracheal tubes, drainage tubes for medical purposes; gastro-intestinal tubes and catheters; disposable feeding tubes and catheters; disposable tubes and catheters for gastro-intestinal drainage, infusion, lavage and specimen collection; disposable tracheostomy tubes; airway respiratory tubes and catheters; disposable suction tubes and catheters; disposable endotracheal tubes and catheters; disposable oxygen tubes and catheters; urinary tubes and catheters; disposable urethral tube and catheters; disposable balloon tubes and catheters; disposable irrigation tubes and catheters; disposable tubes and catheters for diagnostic examination; disposable ureteral tubes and catheters; disposable drainage catheters for cerebrospinal; disposable hydrocephalic shunts; disposable catheters for peritoneal dialysis; disposable bile duct therapeutic catheters; disposable catheters for percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainages; disposable fistula tubes and catheters; disposable arterio-venous shunts (external shunts); disposable tubes and catheters for continuous infusion or drainage (percutaneous indwelling); disposable chronic peritoneal catheters and cufs tube for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; disposable catheters for open heart surgery; disposable blood stream monitoring catheters; disposable guidewire for use with catheters; disposable drainage bags; connectors for connecting catheters and tubes and for connecting catheters to devices; endobronchial blockers, endobronchial tubes, endotracheal blockers; hemostasis balloons for esophageal varices; and accessories for inserting or changing catheters, namely, syringes, scalpels, gauze, puncture needles, dilators, and guidewires | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 26, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 6, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 2, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 2, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 10, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |