Drawing for LADY IN RED

USPTO serial 79256028

LADY IN RED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 5905916Status 709
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 12, 2019
Examiner
DYER, ERIN ZASKODA
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LADY IN RED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher J. Schulte

Christopher J. Schulte Merchant & Gould, P.C.P.O. Box 2910Minneapolis, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management assistance, namely, business meeting planning, initiating telephone calls for others, telephone order-taking services for others, secretarial services provided by hotels; advertising services to create corporate and brand identitySECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
039Delivery, collection and storage of luggage for hotel guests; arranging of transportation for travel toursSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
041Reservation services for theatre tickets; organizing and conducting guided tours of sites of local interest by walking, bicycle, automobile and busSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
045Hotel, concierge services; security, screening of baggage conducted by hotel security staff and concierge staff; personal shopper services; escort services; all rendered in hotels, resorts, residential complexes, condominiums and serviced apartmentsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 29, 2026C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Nov 12, 2024REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 20, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2020FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 6, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 6, 2020FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Feb 12, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 12, 2019R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 27, 2019NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 27, 2019PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 2019GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 7, 2019OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2019OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2019NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 15, 2019CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 15, 2019XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 15, 2019GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2019GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2019CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 12, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2019RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 1, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 30, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 12, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 9, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 8, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 8, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 4, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance