USPTO serial 79256653
G GRAVITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARMON, RAYMOND E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with G GRAVITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Construction of infrastructure; consultancy concerning construction; construction and building remodeling services; railway construction; civil construction; construction of public works; construction of civil infrastructure; Building construction supervision; repair in construction work; building repair work; building construction supervision; residential and commercial building construction; construction of civil engineering structures; construction consultancy; project supervision for construction of civil engineering structures; maintenance of installations and apparatus generating electrical energy; inspection of power generating apparatus and installations; maintenance and repair of energy production installations; supervision of construction structures; professional consulting in the field of construction advising | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Training services in the field of engineering; consultancy services relating to engineering training; training courses relating to engineering | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Construction research services; development of building projects; engineering services; engineering design of building systems; technical project studies; research and development of new products; professional consultancy in the field of environmental advising or technical research; engineering consultancy; engineering project studies; engineering project management services; development of energy and electricity management systems; design and development of systems for renewable energy generation; consultancy concerning technological services in the field of power supply and electricity; consultancy and information services concerning information technology architecture and infrastructure | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 23, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 22, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 21, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2019 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 27, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |