USPTO serial 79256931
CASTELLI DAL 1892 SUA ECCELLENZA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LATTUCA, FRANK J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CASTELLI DAL 1892 SUA ECCELLENZA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat products; fish; mussels (not live); crustaceans, not live; poultry; poultry [meat]; fresh poultry meat; deep-frozen poultry; meat extracts; ham; dried sausages; canned meat; prepared fruits; preserved fruit; frozen fruits; stewed fruits; dried fruits; fruit salads; preserved vegetables; vegetable powders; deep-frozen vegetables; vegetable jellies; meat gelatin; fish jellies; marmalades; milk; milk-based beverages; dairy-based beverages; dairy products; cheeses; butter; yogurt; oils and fats; pickles; fruit preserves; canned vegetables; preserved vegetables; canned meat; preserved fish; game, not live; prepared insects and larvae; processed fruits, mushrooms and vegetables (including nuts and pulses); sausage skins and their imitations; poultry eggs and egg products; dairy products and substitutes; truffle cheeses; cheese-based snacks; coconut milk [beverages]; cheese sticks; fried mozzarella sticks; fried tofu pieces [abura-age]; lactic acid-bacteria based beverages; milk-based beverages containing coffee; milk-based beverages flavored with chocolate; milk-based beverages containing fruit juice; peanut-milk based beverages; coconut-milk based beverages; beverages based on almond milk; milk-based beverages; milk beverages; milk beverages, milk predominating; soy-based beverages used as milk substitutes; yogurt-based beverages; beverages made from yogurt; cheese spread; Cheese fondue; milk ferments for culinary use; soft pastry cheese with a flowered rind; soft white cheeses made of cottage cheese; cheese mixtures; ripened cheeses; low-fat cheese; mold-ripened cheese; hard cheese; mozzarella cheese; cream cheese | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2020 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 10, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 25, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 25, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 2, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 1, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |