USPTO serial 79257125
MEMORY-FLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5887823Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 22, 2019
- Examiner
- DICKSON, RACHAEL
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with MEMORY-FLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ching-cheng Hou
Ching-cheng Hou CS ATTORNEYS AT LAW PLLC305 Broadway, Suite 70New York, NY 10007United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | [ Combs for the hair, large-toothed; electric hair combs; electric rotary hair brush for styling a user's hair, hair brushes; brushes for use in detangling hair; ] hair combs; [ boar, nylon hair for brushes; hairbrushes; hair brush holders; cosmetic brushes; brushes for cleaning household; hair brushes, electric, except parts of machines; ] brushes for pets [ ; brushes for personal hygiene, namely, hair brushes, brushes for grooming pet animals; brushes for grooming horses; mane brushes and horse combs; horse brushes of wire; horse brushes; parts, fittings all for the aforesaid goods ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Richard Ward Couture Styling Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Tangle Angel Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Richard Ward Couture Styling Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Richard Ward Couture Styling Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named MEMORY-FLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2026 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2025 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2024 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 7, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 22, 2019 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 6, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2019 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 1, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 30, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |