USPTO serial 79257173
ERRAI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ERRAI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard L. Bigelow
Richard L. Bigelow Bigelow Patent Law43 Nuangola AveMountaintop, PA 18707UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Intercommunication apparatus; flashing lights [luminous signals]; electronic key fobs being remote control apparatus; monitors [computer programs]; sound recording carriers; magnetic data media; optical data media; computer software, recorded; computer hardware; hardware for computer-aided electronic home control systems, including electric power supply and lighting systems, security and access control systems, audiovisual systems, climate control systems, communication systems, engineering systems; signalling panels, luminous or mechanical; distance recording apparatus; observation instruments; satellite navigational apparatus; computer software applications, downloadable; printers for use with computers; audio- and video- receivers; computer programs, recorded; processors ; electronic publications, downloadable; remote control; signals, luminous or mechanical; sirens; electronic access control systems for Interlocking doors; scanners [data processing equipment]; smartphones; biometric readers; memory card readers; timers; interactive touch screen terminals; gauges; amplifiers; video recorders; sound reproduction apparatus; data processing apparatus; theft prevention installations, electric; optical character readers; acoustic alarms; anti-theft warning apparatus; computer peripheral devices; acoustic couplers; alarms; whistle alarms; readers [data processing equipment]; downloadable image files; downloadable music files; USB flash drives; projection screens; fluorescent screens; equipment for computer-aided video surveillance and video fixing; hardware for computer-aided emergency-call service systems; equipment for computer-aided surveillance systems for breakdowns and emergency alerting, including routers, video cameras, switches, computers, software; equipment for security systems hardware-software control; equipment for observation, monitoring, alarm, alert and control systems other than for medical purposes; electronic equipment for engineering networks control and monitoring systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 4, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 8, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 30, 2020 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2019 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 10, 2019 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 29, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 28, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |