USPTO serial 79257440
Serial No. 79257440
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILSON, MARYNELLE WEST
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 79257440?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Shandong FangLei rose science and Technology Development Co., Ltd.
Pingyin Ind, CN
Other trademarks owned by Shandong FangLei rose science and Technology Development Co., Ltd.
Shandong FangLei rose science and Technology Development Co., Ltd.
Pingyin Ind, CN
Other trademarks owned by Shandong FangLei rose science and Technology Development Co., Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joe McKinney Muncy
JOE MCKINNEY MUNCY MUNCY GEISSLER OLDS & LOWE PC4000 LEGATO ROAD SUITE 310FAIRFAX, VA 22033UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Tea substitutes; chewing gum, not for medical purposes; honey; royal jelly for human consumption, not for medical purposes, namely, royal jelly for food purposes; infusions, not medicinal, namely, herbal infusions and tea for infusions; food flavorings, other than essential oils; condiments, namely, sauces; essences for foodstuffs, except etheric essences and essential oils, namely, coffee essences and tea essences | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 31, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 30, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2020 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 30, 2020 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 30, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 30, 2020 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 2020 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 29, 2020 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 9, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 8, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |