USPTO serial 79257723
THE LUPIN CO.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE LUPIN CO.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Edible flowers and grape leaves, being dried, cooked or preserved foodstuffs; food preparations having a base of milk, namely milk beverages, milk predominating; food preparations having a base of vegetables, namely vegetable-based raw food bars, vegetable-based meat substitutes, vegetable-based snack foods; fruit and vegetable preserves; food products made from cooked fruits, namely cooked fruits; food products made from cooked nuts, namely nut-based snack foods; food products made from cooked vegetables, namely cooked vegetables; food products made from dried fruits, namely nut- and dried fruit-based snack bars; food products made from nuts, namely nut-based snack foods; food spreads consisting principally of dairy products, namely dairy-based dips, dairy-based spreads; fruit based snack food; fruit-based snack foods; snack foods made from dehydrated vegetables; snack foods made from dried vegetables; snack foods made from pre-cooked vegetables, namely vegetable-based snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | dried pasta foods, namely dried pasta; food mixes for making bakery products, namely bread mixes, biscuit mixes; cereal based food bars; food products consisting of cereals, namely cereal bars, ready-to-eat cereals, cereal-based snack food; food products containing flour, namely lupin flour; food products for making nachos, namely lupin chips; food products for making tacos, namely taco chips; food products having a pastry base, namely pastry mixes; foods produced from baked cereals, namely cereal bars, ready-to-eat cereals, cereal-based snack food; foods produced from puffed cereals, namely cereal bars, ready-to-eat cereals, cereal-based snack food; cereal based snack food; foodstuffs made of rice, namely cooked rice; cereal breakfast foods, namely breakfast cereals; foodstuffs made with flour, namely lupin flour; breakfast cereals; cereal snack foods flavoured with cheese; crisp snack food products made from cereals, namely cereal-based snack foods; processed grains for use in food; rice based snack foods; snack foods consisting principally of grain; snack foods consisting principally of pasta, namely dried pasta | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | food for animals; milled food products for animals, namely unprocessed lupins; pelleted pet food; bird food; pet food; protein foodstuffs for animal consumption; raw pulses; stall food for animals; vegetable protein foodstuffs for consumption by animals; wheat protein foodstuffs for animals; canned foods for animals; canned foods for cats; canned foods for dogs; cat food; cattle food; cereal based foodstuffs for animals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 3, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2019 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 16, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 15, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 6, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |