USPTO serial 79258110
TYPSA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5980305Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 11, 2020
- Examiner
- FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with TYPSA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph R. Meaney
Joseph R. Meaney Venjuris, P.C.1938 East Osborn Rd.Phoenix, AZ 85016United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Building construction supervision | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Architecture and urban planning services; counseling services in the field of industrial, marine and agricultural engineering; engineering technical project studies and engineering expert reports; counseling services in the field of environmental protection research; consultancy on quality control; testing and analysis of materials; physics, chemical, geological and biological research; consultancy in the field of civil engineering | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TÉCNICA Y PROYECTOS, S.A
- Other trademarks owned by TÉCNICA Y PROYECTOS, S.A
- Other trademarks owned by TÉCNICA Y PROYECTOS, S.A
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TYPSA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2026 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2026 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2026 | PR75 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15 | — |
| May 18, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 19, 2026 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2025 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2020 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 11, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 28, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 24, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 24, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2019 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |