Drawing for INOKIM

USPTO serial 79258513

INOKIM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SEVERSON, JUSTIN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INOKIM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Electrically operated bicycles; bicycles; land vehicles, namely, automobiles; apparatus for locomotion by land, air or water, namely, automobiles, airplanes, locomotives, ships and boats; bicycle parts, namely, bottom bracket sets comprising cone spacers; wheelchairs; dollies, namely, motorized luggage carts; air pumps for two-wheeled motor vehicles or bicycles; tires for vehicles; ships and boatsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 29, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 26, 2022CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jan 23, 2021FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 7, 2021FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 7, 2021FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 1, 2020OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 14, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 14, 2020OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 7, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 7, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 12, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 24, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 24, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 7, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 6, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 28, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 22, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 20, 2019LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 9, 2019SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance