USPTO serial 79258671
DIVASTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIVASTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumery products | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing for women | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Online retail services for cosmetics other than for medical use; online retail services for toothpastes other than for medical use; online retail services for perfumery; online retail services for essential oils, online retail services for precious metal alloys; online retail services for parures (jewelry); online retail services for precious stones; online retail services for clocks; online retail services for time measurement instruments; online retail services for belts (clothing); online retail services for underwear; online retail services for corsets (underclothing); online retail services for swim shorts; online retail services for women; advertising; commercial business management; commercial administration; office functions; online advertising; radio advertising; online advertising on a computer network; production of tele-shopping programs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2021 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 1, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 30, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2019 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |