USPTO serial 79258859
FOLDABLE DISPLAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLLAND, JAMI ELENA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 122 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FOLDABLE DISPLAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electrophoresis apparatus; measuring machines, apparatus, and accessories or parts thereof; inspection devices for semiconductor integrated circuits; machines and apparatus for distribution or control of electric power; machines and apparatus for electric control; circuit testers; electrical and magnetic measuring instruments and accessories thereof; liquid crystal display devices; organic light emitting diode (OLED) display panels; display devices using electrophoresis elements; GPS navigation devices; mobile phones; telecommunication machines and apparatus; televisions; portable computer terminals for displaying electronic publications; computer terminals for displaying electronic publications; sound reproduction apparatus; computers and computer peripherals; notebook computers; laptop computers; tablet computers; personal computers; microcomputers; computer motherboards; computer monitors; touch panels for computers; touch panels for personal digital assistants; semiconductor power elements; electronic appliances equipped with semiconductor power elements; electronic tags; integrated circuit cards; electronic card readers for integrated circuit cards; magnetic coded card readers; electronic card writers for integrated circuit cards; magnetic coded card writers; radio transmitters and receivers; digital data memory devices; semiconductor memories; computer chips; integrated circuits; semiconductor integrated circuits including CPUs; microprocessors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |