USPTO serial 79258941
MAXI CLEAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AURAND, MEGAN LEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAXI CLEAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; dentifrices; cosmetic preparations for eyelashes; eyebrow cosmetics; cosmetic preparations for skin care; cosmetic preparations for baths; beauty masks; oils for cosmetic purposes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 23, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 1, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 31, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2019 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2019 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |