USPTO serial 79259013
NICKEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NICKEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Brokerage of currency; clearing house financial services; computerised financial services; conducting of financial transactions; currency exchange services; currency trading; electronic funds transfer; electronic money transfer services; financial brokerage; financial exchange services; financial information and evaluations; financial information processing; financial information services; financial modelling services; financial payment services; financial services; foreign exchange information services; foreign exchange transactions; monetary exchange services; monetary transaction services; money brokerage; money transfer services; on-line real-time currency trading; preparation and quotation of exchange rate information; processing of payments for banks; providing financial information; providing financial information via a web site; providing stock/securities market information; provision of exchange rate lists; provision of online currency exchange calculators; recording the transfer of securities; securities brokerage services; securities exchange services; securities settlement; securities trading services; traded options brokerage; trading in options; trading in securities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 15, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2020 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 26, 2019 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 2019 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 8, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 1, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 28, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 23, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |