Drawing for LIQUIBAND EXCEED

USPTO serial 79259025

LIQUIBAND EXCEED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 6132422Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 25, 2020
Examiner
WATTS-FITZGERALD, CAITLIN C
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with LIQUIBAND EXCEED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $425

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mainak H. Mehta

Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Wound closures, namely, wound dressings, wound sutures; suture needles and hemostatic suture instruments for affixing implants, meshes and dressings to the body, both externally or internally, and for sealing varices; sutures and suture materials; artificial skin for surgical purposes; bone prostheses; surgical implants comprising artificial material; gloves for medical purposes; non-chemical contraceptive devices, namely, intra-uterine contraceptive devices; catheters; ostomy bags; intravenous feeding tubes, intravenous drainage tubes, and intravenous drainage tube linings for medical purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 2026NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2026C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 21, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 25, 2026ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2025REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2021FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 16, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 15, 2020FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Nov 25, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 25, 2020R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 9, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 9, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 5, 2020GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 20, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 20, 2020OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 20, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 1, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 24, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 24, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 23, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 19, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 19, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 17, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2019RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 17, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 17, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 1, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 30, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 29, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 28, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 25, 2019LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
May 23, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance