USPTO serial 79259586
AVATAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AVATAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric batteries for vehicles; antennas; remote control apparatus; sound recording apparatus; apparatus for transmission of sound; speakers; coaxial cables; fiber optic cables; electric cables; electrical contacts; cabinets for loudspeakers; megaphones; acoustic membranes used in sound recording or reproducing apparatus; microphones; headphones; sheaths for electric cables; remote control transmitters; transmitters of electronic signals; electrical switches; converters, electric; satellite navigational apparatus; telegraph wires; telephone wires; electric wires; electrical conductors; insulated copper wire; players; electrical control panels; voltage surge protectors; horns for loudspeakers; electrical connections; sound amplifiers; devices for sound playback; wiring, all of the foregoing for use in automobiles; specifically excluding audio and audiovisual recordings, and none of the foregoing associated with motion picture films or television programs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2022 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 21, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 9, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 9, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 8, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |