USPTO serial 79259870
REVITO SHOES COMFORT BY TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 23, 2020
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with REVITO SHOES COMFORT BY TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Sullivan
111 N. Market St., Ste. 300San Jose, CA 95113UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Orthopedic and mobility aids, namely, orthopedic inner soles incorporating arch supports; physical therapy equipment, namely, balance boards, balance foam pads, and pivot discs | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, skirts, pants, bottoms, shorts, dresses, tops, shirts, t-shirts, sweaters, sweatshirts, beachwear, jackets, coats, uniforms, undergarments, and sportswear, namely sports jackets, sports pants, sports shorts, and sports shirts; footwear; headgear, namely, hats, caps being headwear, and headbands | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by biodyn Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by biodyn Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by biodyn Holding B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named REVITO SHOES COMFORT BY TECHNOLOGY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2025 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 23, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 7, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 18, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 25, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 15, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 13, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 4, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |