USPTO serial 79259966
TRITON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PHILLIPS, WENDELL SHARMAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRITON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William F. Kolakowski III
William F. Kolakowski III Reising Ethington P.C.755 West Big Beaver Road, Suite 1850Troy, MI 48084UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | grinding wheels exclusively for grinding metal and ceramics and exclusively for use in stationary power-operated grinding machines, namely worm grinding wheels, grinding rings, disc grinding wheels, profile grinding wheels, and single profile grinding wheels | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2019 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 22, 2019 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 22, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |