Drawing for ARCHIPRODUCTS

USPTO serial 79260291

ARCHIPRODUCTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 6405577Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 6, 2021
Examiner
LAMONT, JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with ARCHIPRODUCTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $1,097*

Plus Government fees of $975

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael F. Swartz

Michael F. Swartz Egbert, McDaniel & Swartz, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Suite 1250Houston, TX 77002United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising; business management; business administration; providing office functionsACTIVE—
038Telecommunications, namely, telecommunication access services, transfer of data by telecommunications, e-mail services in the nature of electronic transmission of email, transmission of messages from customers to sellers and from sellers to customers, services that allow customers to contact sellers in the nature of computer aided transmission of messages, providing access to databases, providing access to house organs on the Internet in the fields of architecture, decòr, and civil engineering, providing transmission of graphics, videos and information by means of telecommunications networks, wireless communication networks, and the Internet; streaming of video material on the InternetACTIVE—
042Scientific and technological services, namely, computer hardware design and research and design relating thereto, namely, research and design in the field of computer technology; scientific and technological research in the field of civil engineering, architecture and interior design; industrial analysis and research services in the fields of architecture, decòr, and civil engineering; design and development of computer hardware and softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 2026NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2026C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 2, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Oct 8, 2026ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 6, 2026REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2021FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 29, 2021FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 28, 2021FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Oct 6, 2021FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2021R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 24, 2021GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 21, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 31, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 31, 2021OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 31, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 9, 2021RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 28, 2020OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 11, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 11, 2020OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Aug 18, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 11, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 10, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 17, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 2, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 19, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 2, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 2, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 15, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 14, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 13, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 11, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 11, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance