USPTO serial 79260655
BH BAKER HOUSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BH BAKER HOUSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leo V. Gureff
Leo V. Gureff MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, P.C4000 Legato Road; Suite 310Fairfax, VA 22033UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Cookies; pancakes; buns; bread rolls; vanillin for use as a food flavoring; vanilla flavorings for food or beverages; waffles; vermicelli; coffee flavored syrup used in making food beverages; natural sweeteners; rice-based snack food; cereal-based snack food; pastries; confectionery for decorating Christmas trees; cakes; pastries, namely, pasties, biscuits, bread; cakes; cookies; croissants; cup cakes; eclairs, meat pies; meat turnovers, pies, scones, muffins, donuts, rolled cakes, pancakes, biscuit, and crepes; quiches; crackers; hominy grits; groats for human food; corn, milled; corn, roasted; meat pies; marzipan; custard; confectionery, namely, pastilles; molasses for food; pepper; petits fours [cakes]; malt biscuits; macaroons [pastry]; petit-beurre biscuits; pies; fondants [confectionery]; cereal preparations, namely, rolls, crackers, crisp bread, bakery goods, breakfast cereal, ready to eat cereal, cereal derived food bars; oat-based food, namely, bakery goods, oat-based snacks and cereals, oar derived food bars; almond paste; tortillas; tarts; bread; unleavened bread; cereal-based snack food in the shape of chips | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2022 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 15, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 28, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2020 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 27, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 7, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 28, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |