USPTO serial 79261361
SEAONICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 3, 2020
- Examiner
- YOO, JEANE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with SEAONICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nitin Kaushik
50 Lerer LaneStaten Island, NY 10307UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Cranes and winches and power tools, namely, pallet skidding systems, for moving loads; capstans; handling apparatus for loading and unloading; feeder tools, namely, fish feeding system in the nature of electronic feeders for fish, transportation of pellet fodder in pipes by air-pressure or water flow; lifts, namely, elevators; gears for machines and gear boxes, other than for land vehicles; lifts, other than ski-lifts, namely, cursor systems in the nature of lifting installations and lifting machines for lifting of equipment through moon pool on vessels; door openers and closers, hydraulic; hydraulic controls for machines, motors and engines; automatic manipulators, namely, cargo handling machines for marine and offshore operations; lifting and hoisting apparatus, namely, winches and cranes for marine and offshore operations; pneumatic controls for machines, motors and engines; mechanical and electric reeling apparatus, namely, machines for reeling cables, ropes, chains, hoses and fish nets for marine and offshore operations; machine parts, namely, cutting guides for machines; control mechanisms for machines, engines or motors, namely, hydraulic controls for machines, motors and engines; pulleys being parts of machines and electric pulley blocks; service elevators; valves being parts of machines; windlasses | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Machinery installation, maintenance and repair | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 2025 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2021 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2021 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 3, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 18, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 29, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2020 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2020 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 29, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 25, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 20, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |