USPTO serial 79261739
ECO GRES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5986926Status 739Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 18, 2020
- Examiner
- CIANCI, RYAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with ECO GRES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil B Friedman
Neil B Friedman Hodgson Russ LLP605 Third AvenueSuite 2300New York, NY 10158Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | [ Household or kitchen utensils and containers, namely, spatulas, cooking strainers and beverage stirrers; decorative or functional glassware for beverages, for household purposes; decorative or functional porcelain for household purposes, namely, mugs of porcelain; decorative or functional earthenware for household purposes, namely, serving dishes; household utensils of stoneware for oven use, namely, oven dishes of ceramics; ] decorative or functional goods for household purposes of stoneware, namely, trivets of ceramics [ ; decorative or functional goods for household purposes of terra cotta, namely, statuettes of terra cotta ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GRESTEL - PRODUTOS CERÂMICOS, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by GRESTEL - PRODUTOS CERÂMICOS, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by GRESTEL - PRODUTOS CERÂMICOS, S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named ECO GRES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2026 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2026 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 4, 2026 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2025 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 20, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2020 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 18, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 3, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 13, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 4, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |