USPTO serial 79262521
EASY M MECALUX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 6104104Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 21, 2020
- Examiner
- POLZER, NATALIE M
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with EASY M MECALUX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $850
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Angel Miguel Munoz, Esq.
Angel Miguel Munoz, Esq. Munoz-Lopez & Associates PLLC305 BroadwaySuite 704New York, NY 10007Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable supply chain management and automation software for managing warehouse inventory, warehouse storage allocations, warehouse workers, warehouse equipment, supply chain operations and industrial automation; recorded supply chain management and automation software for managing warehouse inventory, warehouse storage allocations, warehouse workers, warehouse equipment, supply chain operations and industrial automation | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Industrial analysis, research and design in the field of robotics and new technologies, software, computer programming, installation and maintenance of computer software; software updating, engineering services relating to the computerized automation of industrial processes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 17, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2025 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 10, 2020 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 21, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2020 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 21, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 5, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 15, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2020 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 28, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2019 | CRSN | CORRECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | CRCR | CORRECTION CREATED FOR IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2019 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 20, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |