USPTO serial 79262713
VEGAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUNKLEMAN, SARAH E
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VEGAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES Y PARK
CHARLES Y PARK NSIP LAWPO BOX 65745WASHINGTON, DC 20035UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Preserved, frozen, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; vegetable-based meat substitutes; soya milk; milk substitutes; vegetarian sausages; processed algae for human consumption; processed nuts; processed mushrooms; frozen, frosted, preserved, processed, dried, cooked or crystallized vegetable extracts for culinary purposes for use in prepared meals or food; tofu; cheese substitutes; pollen prepared as foodstuff; jellies for food; sweet corn, processed; fruit juices for cooking; potato sticks; all the foregoing being vegan products and products that contain no animal products | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2020 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 30, 2020 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 30, 2020 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 2020 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2020 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 12, 2020 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 9, 2020 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 30, 2020 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |