USPTO serial 79263059
MEDUSA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 6155674Status 708Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 22, 2020
- Examiner
- MICHAUD-KING, JILLIAN L
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with MEDUSA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $425
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael N. Mercanti
Michael N. Mercanti Lucas & Mercanti, LLP100 South Jefferson Road, Suite 202Whippany, NJ 07981United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Food preparations made from fish, namely, fish cakes, fish burger patties, fishballs being steamed or fried balls of fish paste, fish steaks, [ fish mousse, ] fish skewers being shish kabobs, fish soup, canned fish, [ fish sausages, ] pickled fish, [ smoked fish, dried fish, ] and frozen fish; seafood salad, not live, namely, mixtures of crustaceans and mollusks and marinated mixtures of crustaceans and mollusks, namely, cuttlefish, squids, mussels, octopus and clam; prepared carpaccio dishes made primarily of fish and octopus; mackerel fillets, sardine fillets, anchovy fillets in oil and natural juice; preserves and semi-preserves of fish, namely, anchovies marinated in oil, marinated eels, battered and fried seafood [ , and tuna that has been salted, smoked, canned, chilled, frozen, pasteurized, dried, pickled, marinated, steamed, fried, battered, grilled, roasted, and preserved in oil, liquid, sauce, and broth ] ; prepared vegetable meals, consisting primarily of grilled and steamed vegetables, legumes and olives in natural juice and in oil | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | [ Ready-made fish-based sauces; food dressings being sauces; seasonings ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CESARE REGNOLI & FIGLIO S.r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by CESARE REGNOLI & FIGLIO S.r.l.
- Other trademarks owned by CESARE REGNOLI & FIGLIO S.r.l.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named MEDUSA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2026 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2026 | C75P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 19, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 15, 2026 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2025 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2021 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 22, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 7, 2020 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2020 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 17, 2020 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2020 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2020 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2020 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2020 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2020 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 10, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 20, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2019 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 23, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |