USPTO serial 79263348
ELTEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIACHE, AUBREY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ELTEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Protective work clothing (for protection against accident or injury); eyeglass frames; computer software, recorded for transformation, gathering, compilation, transmission and display of data and information in the field of safety at work, protection against accidents and in the medical field; safety helmets; measuring, counting, alignment and calibrating instruments; measuring transducers; instrument transformers; mobile apps for transformation, gathering, compilation, transmission and display of data and information in the field of safety at work, protection against accidents and in the medical field; safety goggles; protective helmets; protective masks; sensors and detectors; safety footwear for protection against accident or injury; safety, security, protection and signalling devices and equipment; computer software applications, downloadable, for transformation, gathering, compilation, transmission and display of data and information in the field of safety at work, protection against accidents and in the medical field; diving equipment; diving suits; clothing for protection against accidents, irradiation and fire; shoes for protection against accidents, irradiation and fire; protective shoes against accidents and injury; safety shoes; parts and fittings of all the aforesaid goods, included in the class; shoe soles and shoe inserts as parts and/or fittings for safety and protective shoes; safety shoe soles; fireproof shoelaces as parts and/or fittings for fireproof shoes | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing; headgear; footwear; work shoes; business shoes, protective sports shoes; parts and fittings of all the aforesaid goods, included in the class; protective metal members for shoes and boots; shoe soles; shoe inserts for non-orthopaedic purposes; work clothes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2020 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| May 8, 2020 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 2020 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 27, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 17, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2019 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |