USPTO serial 79263589
LAUV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5980365Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 11, 2020
- Examiner
- MISCHLER, MEGAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LAUV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
OCEANSCAN - MARINE SYSTEMS & TECHNOLOGY LDA
PT
Other trademarks owned by OCEANSCAN - MARINE SYSTEMS & TECHNOLOGY LDA
OCEANSCAN - MARINE SYSTEMS & TECHNOLOGY LDA
PT
Other trademarks owned by OCEANSCAN - MARINE SYSTEMS & TECHNOLOGY LDA
OCEANSCAN - MARINE SYSTEMS & TECHNOLOGY LDA
PT
Other trademarks owned by OCEANSCAN - MARINE SYSTEMS & TECHNOLOGY LDA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua M. Gerben, Esq.
Joshua M. Gerben, Esq. Gerben Law Firm, PLLC1050 Connecticut Ave. NWSuite 500Washington, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Autonomous underwater vehicles for seabed inspections, seabed mapping and water column surveying | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OCEANSCAN - MARINE SYSTEMS & TECHNOLOGY LDA
- Other trademarks owned by OCEANSCAN - MARINE SYSTEMS & TECHNOLOGY LDA
- Other trademarks owned by OCEANSCAN - MARINE SYSTEMS & TECHNOLOGY LDA
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named LAUV
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2026 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 11, 2025 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 21, 2020 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 21, 2020 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| May 11, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 11, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 26, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 6, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 26, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 20, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 30, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |