Drawing for BLITZ ENGINE

USPTO serial 79263707

BLITZ ENGINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAMONT, JOHN CHRISTOPHER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLITZ ENGINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alexander Lazouski

Alexander Lazouski Lazouski IP LLC14726 Bowfin Terrace, Suite 1Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game software; holograms; joysticks for use with computers, other than for video games; interfaces for computers; video game cartridges; memory cards for video game machines; computer keyboards; electronic book readers; laptop computers; tablet computers; notebook computers; magnets; decorative magnets; mouse being computer peripheral; headphones; magnetic data media; recorded computer software for development of computer games; computer hardware; downloadable computer software development tools; recorded computer operating programs in the field of video games; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of articles, magazines in the field of computer games; humanoid robots with artificial intelligence; smartglasses; smartphones; smartwatches; bags adapted for laptops; video recorders; apparatus for reproducing sound; data processing apparatus; computer peripheral devices; downloadable ring tones for mobile phones; downloadable image files containing characters of video games; downloadable music files; animated cartoons; USB flash drives; cases for smartphones; sleeves for laptops; covers for personal digital assistants [PDAs]; covers for tablet computers; covers for smartphones; virtual reality headsets; cell phone straps; all of the above limited to the field of computer gamesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 10, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 8, 2022MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 8, 2022ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 7, 2022EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2021RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 23, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 30, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 30, 2020OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 31, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 1, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Mar 19, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 19, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 28, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2020ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 6, 2020LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW—
Dec 13, 2019LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Sep 13, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 27, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 27, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 3, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 2, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 29, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 29, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance