Drawing for NESCO

USPTO serial 79263954

NESCO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KUNKLEMAN, SARAH E
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NESCO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Wm. Tucker Griffith

WM TUCKER GRIFFITH LATHROP GPM LLP28 STATE STREETBOSTON, MA 02109-1775UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Nestable containers of plastic for storage and transport for commercial and industrial use; Nestable packaging containers of plastic; Transport containers, namely, containers for transport, not of metal; Nestable container closures of plastic materials; Nestable plastic storage containers for commercial and industrial use; Shipping and storage boxes of plastic material; Plastic medication containers for commercial useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 16, 2021FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 26, 2021FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2021FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 23, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 30, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 30, 2020OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 24, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 1, 2020ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 1, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 1, 2020EXDDEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED—
Mar 28, 2020GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2020GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2020CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 25, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 25, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2020ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 19, 2020ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 19, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 19, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 16, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 16, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 16, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 27, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 27, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 27, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 7, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 30, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 29, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 9, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 8, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 30, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance