USPTO serial 79264007
TECHITSMART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAKER, JORDAN A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TECHITSMART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric and electronic apparatus for lamps, for LED lamps and electroluminescent films for urban lighting; upstream switching equipment and electric ignition devices for electroluminescent lamps for urban lighting; electric pre-engagement devices and ignition devices for high-pressure discharge lamps and low-pressure discharge lamps for urban lighting; electronic apparatus for light control installations and darkening devices, light detectors, motion detectors, infrared remotes, attenuators for urban public equipment; control devices and apparatus for urban lighting installations, filters and blocking filters, light outputs, lenses for focusing light; light-emitting diodes for urban lighting; fiber optic ducts of glass or plastic fibers intended for urban lighting; control devices and apparatus for lighting installations, lamps and darkening devices; frames for light guidance; enclosures for electric connections and control or remote control; all the aforesaid goods not being for vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Lighting installations, devices and apparatus and lamps for urban lighting; fiber optic lighting equipment for urban lighting; direct and indirect fluorescent indoor lighting; illuminating modules and LED lamps serving as light sources for urban lighting; light sources (not included in other classes) including light-emitting diodes for urban lighting; lamp reflectors and covers, lamp sockets, lamps suspension arms; urban lighting lanterns; all the aforesaid goods not being for vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Project study and technical planning of urban lighting installations; conducting calculation programs for electronic data processing facilities; all the above goods not being for vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 15, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 1, 2024 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2020 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2020 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 1, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 27, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 26, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2019 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 6, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |