USPTO serial 79264054
CELSUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WRIGHT, MARCO JABBAR
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CELSUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura J. Winston
Laura J. Winston Offit Kurman, P.A.10 East 40th StreetNew York, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Plastic building materials, namely, plastic decorative molding, plastic wallboards, plastic floorboards, plastic tiles, plastic decorative laminates; synthetic building materials; thermosetting resin laminated sheet materials and thermosetting resin laminated boards for building; rubber building and construction materials, namely, rubber decks, rubber floor tiles, rubber flooring; lime building or construction materials; building or construction materials of plaster, namely, plaster boards; prefabricated building kits not of metal comprised mainly of base and wall panels; building timber; building stone; joinery fittings not of metal; melamine resin impregnated decorative laminates; nonflammable decorative laminates made of melamine resin; phenol resin impregnated decorative laminates; polyester resin impregnated decorative laminates; building decorative laminates made mainly of synthetic resin | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 10, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2020 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 4, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 25, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 24, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |