USPTO serial 79264186
INTEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWNING, LUKE CASH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
REBECCA LIEBOWITZ
REBECCA LIEBOWITZ VENABLE LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; non-medicated soaps, namely, sugar soaps; cloths impregnated with cleaning polishing, scouring or abrasive preparations | ACTIVE | — |
| 006 | Common metals and their alloys, unwrought or semi wrought; metal channels, metal sealing channels, metal furring channels; metal wall tracks; grid systems comprised of metal ceiling tiles; metal beams and metal suspension rods for hanging up articles; metallic components used in ceiling systems and otherwise for use in building, namely, metal building brackets, bird repellent metal spikes, metal fastening anchors and metal mounting brackets for general use; butt joinery fittings made of metal; wall tracks made of metal; wall studs made of metal; tracks made of metal for wall systems; metal sections for wall systems, namely, metal top hat beam sections; metal materials for building and construction, namely, metal piles; metal finishing profiles, namely, bullnose external corner trims made from metal; metal flashing angles and metal arch beams; metal casing beads; drywall corner metal stopping beads; metal finishing profiles, namely, metal joint trims; and metal window and door reveal bead trim; metal fasteners, namely, screws, nails, staples for construction, anchors, tie wire spikes, suspension shelf brackets; metal hardware, namely, washers; metal fasteners, namely, metal nails collated in gun load strips; non electric cables and wires of common metal; metal repair patches for use with metal building materials; small items of metal hardware, namely, high security locks and sheet metal plates primarily for use in building and construction; locks of metal; metal containers for storage or transport; metal ladders, namely, metal step ladders; metal scaffolding; manhole frames made of metal; step stools of metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Non metallic building materials, namely, asphalted roofing paper for use in building and construction; non metallic scaffolding; grout; cementitious material for building purposes; surfacing compounds, namely, protective sealing coatings sold as an integral component of stone and filling cement; tar based asphalt sealants for filling cracks; bitumen based driveway sealants for plugging gaps; manhole frames made from plastics material, namely, manhole frames made from PVC; non metal building access panels, namely, non metal sound rated wall access panels and fire rated wall access panels for buildings; non metal fire resistant boards and panels for construction; non metal fire retardant boards and panels for construction | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail and wholesale store services featuring building products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2024 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 25, 2023 | IRRH | IRREGULARITY FROM IB EXAMINED BY MPU | — |
| May 24, 2023 | IRFI | IRREGULARITY ON FINAL DECISION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 3, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2022 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 3, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 3, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 3, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 30, 2022 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 19, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 19, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 20, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 12, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2020 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2019 | CRSN | CORRECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2019 | CRSN | CORRECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | CRCR | CORRECTION CREATED FOR IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2019 | CRCR | CORRECTION CREATED FOR IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 16, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2019 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |