USPTO serial 79264208
AMKCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5969924Status 707Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 28, 2020
- Examiner
- DUBRAY, KATHERINE M
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with AMKCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew D. Dorisio
Andrew D. Dorisio DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC300 West Vine Street, Suite 1700Lexington, KY 40507United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Sifting machines and filtering machines used both in the food and chemical industries; machines for separating target materials from mixtures of materials; vibrating separators being machines; grinding machines; motors for vibrating separators being machines, sifting separators and filtering apparatus being machines; grinding media as parts for machines; centrifugal mills; sieves being parts of machines; industrial machines for sieving; sifting installations for metals; vibration channels for sifting being parts of machines; filtering machines for use in mineral, food, dairy, chemical, pulp, paper and associated process industries; filters for vibrating separators as parts of machines, sifting separators and filtering apparatus perforated screens being parts of machines for sorting of materials; vibrating screens being parts of machines; screening machines, namely, vibratory screen separators | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | [ Retail store services and retail and wholesale distributorship services featuring sifting machines and filtering machines, separators, vibrating separators as machines, motors for vibrating separators as machines, sifting separators and filtering apparatus, grinding media being parts for machines, wire mesh cloths, sieves being parts of machines, industrial machines for sieving, sifting installations, vibration channels for sifting, filtering machines for use in mineral, food, dairy, chemical, pulp, paper and associated process industries, filters for vibrating separators being machines, perforated screens being parts of machines for sorting of materials, vibrating screens being parts of machines, screening machines; business information and enquiries ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2026 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 18, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2025 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2021 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jun 17, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 17, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2020 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 6, 2020 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 6, 2020 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 28, 2020 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2020 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 12, 2019 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2019 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 9, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2019 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2019 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2019 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2019 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 15, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |