USPTO serial 79264366
OPEN WINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEDMAN, CORI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OPEN WINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processing equipment, equipment for information processing; software (recorded programs); software for the provision of information; software enabling the access to information on the Internet; downloadable software in the field of food and drink; downloadable software in the nature of mobile applications for facilitating the selection of restaurants, bars and wine bars; downloadable software in the nature of mobile applications for facilitating reservations in restaurants, bars and wine bars; mobile applications for sharing information and resources on restaurants, bars and wine bars; a mobile application for the maintenance of databases with respect to restaurant and bar facilities, the selection of restaurants and bars and the provision of information with respect to restaurants and bars | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications; transmission of information retrieved from indexes and searchable information databases via global computer networks; providing access to online databases in the field of food and drink, bars and wine bars; provision of on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages and multimedia content among Internet users in the field of restaurants, bars and wine bars; electronic transmission of digital photo files, video and audiovisual contents between internet users | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services as well as research and design services relating thereto; design and development of software; computer services, such as provision of search engines for obtaining information on restaurants and bars via computer networks and global computer networks; provision of access to online non-downloadable software enabling users to share information on restaurants and bars, making reservations in restaurants and bars; hosting a website enabling users to make reservations in restaurants and bars; design of information indexes on restaurants, bars and wine bars; application service providers (ASP) featuring software and databases; design and development of computer hardware and software; provision of temporary access to software interfaces accessible via the Internet to create personalized online information services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 17, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 17, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 20, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 1, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 19, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 18, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |