Drawing for KINGDOM COME DELIVERANCE

USPTO serial 79264503

KINGDOM COME DELIVERANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BICE, DANIEL TRAVIS
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KINGDOM COME DELIVERANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN ALUMIT

JOHN ALUMIT ALUMIT IP135 S JACKSON STREET, SUITE 200GLENDALE, CA 91205UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable and recorded video game software; Downloadable and recorded computer game software; downloadable computer game programs; recorded computer game programs; Downloadable and recorded virtual reality game software; Downloadable and recorded interactive multimedia computer game programs; Downloadable and recorded electronic game software for handheld electronic devices; computer game software downloadable from a global computer networkACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 3, 2021FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 14, 2021FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Oct 14, 2021FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 13, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 26, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 14, 2020MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 8, 2020ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 8, 2020EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 20, 2020EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 8, 2020GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2020GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2020CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 19, 2020JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 12, 2020EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 12, 2020EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 31, 2020RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 5, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 2, 2019GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 2, 2019GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 2, 2019CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 22, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2019GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2019GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2019TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 5, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 14, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 14, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 20, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 17, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 16, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance