USPTO serial 79264687
CYBOT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORNWELL, ANDREA B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CYBOT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software; software, namely, software for website and data crawling, data scanning, data identification, data tracking, data monitoring, data security, data management, including consent management; software for delivery of data from repositories and databases; software for data documentation, data descriptions, data reporting, data logging, data control and first and third-party data consent; software for language detection, geo targeting, data communication, data processing, and data transmission; software to track and monitor data in order to comply with regulations and laws in the field of data privacy, data security, and data governance; software to implement controls, assessments, and policies, and to monitor, report, and communicate privacy practices to others, all in the field of data privacy, data security, and data governance | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer software; design and development of computer software, namely, software for data monitoring, data tracking, data security, data documentation, data logging, data control and first and third-party data consent, data communication, data processing, data transmission; design and development of computer software for delivery of data from repositories and databases; design and development of computer software for data documentation, data descriptions, data reporting, data logging, data control and first and third-party data consent; design and development of computer software for language detection, geo targeting, data communication, data processing, and data transmission; design and development of computer software to track and monitor data in order to comply with regulations and laws in the field of data privacy, data security, and data governance; design and development of computer software to implement controls, assessments, and policies, and to monitor, report, and communicate privacy practices to others, all in the field of data privacy, data security, and data governance; technological services; technological services, namely, software as a service (saas) services featuring software for website and data crawling, data scanning, data identification, data tracking, data monitoring, data security and data management, including consent management; technological services, namely, software as a service (saas) services featuring software for delivery of data from repositories and databases; technological services, namely, software as a service (saas) services featuring software for data documentation, data descriptions, data reporting, data logging, data control and first and third-party data consent; technological services, namely, software as a service (saas) services featuring software for language detection, geo targeting, data communication, data processing, and data transmission; technological services, namely, software as a service (saas) services featuring software to track and monitor data in order to comply with regulations and laws in the field of data privacy, data security, and data governance; technological services, namely, software as a service (saas) services featuring software to implement controls, assessments, and policies, and to monitor, report, and communicate privacy practices to others, all in the field of data privacy, data security, and data governance | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 30, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 29, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2019 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |