USPTO serial 79264950
CHEFSLIST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHEFSLIST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Mobile apps, namely, mobile applications for ordering foodstuff, beverages, and restaurant supplies; recorded data, namely, recorded data files; software, namely, software for ordering foodstuff, beverages, and restaurant supplies | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising and promotional services; marketing, namely, marketing services; product demonstration; provision of advertising space, namely, provision of advertising space by electronic means and global information networks; comparison shopping services; ordering services for third parties, namely, on-line ordering services featuring foodstuff, beverages, and restaurant supplies; market research; collection and systematization of business data, namely, collection of market research information | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Provision of search engines, namely, computer services, namely, providing search engines for obtaining data on a global computer network; IT services, namely, IT consulting services; software development, namely, computer software development; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for ordering foodstuff, beverages, and restaurant supplies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 23, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 23, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 24, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2019 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |