USPTO serial 79264974
PROCESS DIAMOND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HETZEL, DANNEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROCESS DIAMOND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs for processing information; computer software applications (downloadable); computer software for business purposes; data processors for business data; computer programs for scientific data analysis; data processing programmes; data processing software; data processing systems; machine readable data carrying apparatus; programs for data-processing; programs for processing data on computers; data processing programs; computer programs for the analysis of data processing procedures; apparatus for processing recorded sound; computer programs for the analysis of data processing performance; computer programs for data processing; computer programs for processing data; process monitors; application software | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advice relating to business management; business data analysis; business data analysis services; business efficiency expert services; business efficiency studies; business information; business management; business management advice; business management advisory services; business management consultancy; computer data processing; advice relating to business organisation; computerised data processing; consultancy relating to business management; consultancy relating to data processing; data processing; data processing for businesses; data processing for the collection of data for business purposes; electronic data processing; information services relating to businesses; online data processing services; professional business consultancy; advisory services for business management; advisory services relating to business management; advisory services relating to business organisation; advisory services relating to data processing; business analysis services; business consultancy; business consultancy services relating to data processing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2021 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2021 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2021 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 3, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2019 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 26, 2019 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 25, 2019 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2019 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2019 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2019 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2019 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |