Drawing for SWIZZ STYLE

USPTO serial 79264992

SWIZZ STYLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DOUGLAS
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SWIZZ STYLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Zaccaria

John Zaccaria Notaro, Michalos & Zaccaria P.C.100 Dutch Hill Road, Suite 240Orangeburg, NY 10962UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Apparatus for lighting, heating, steam generating, cooking, cooling, drying, ventilating, namely, humidifiers, air purifiers, electric fans, electric heating fans, grills, namely, electric grills and gas grills, electric kettles, electric toasters, electric coffee maker, dehumidifiers, evaporative air coolers, air conditioners, electric dispensers for air freshener and electric toaster ovens; all of the above-mentioned goods are of Swiss originSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
021Household or kitchen utensils and containers not made of precious metals, namely, non-electric food blenders, non-electric kettles, non-electric coffee makers; combs and cleaning sponges; clothes brushes, except paint brushes; all of the above-mentioned goods are of Swiss originSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2022DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2022DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 24, 2021FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 27, 2021FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2021FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 5, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2021OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 13, 2021OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2021OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 25, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 25, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 12, 2020GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 12, 2020GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 12, 2020CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 5, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 5, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 5, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2020ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS—
Mar 5, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 5, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 7, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 24, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 23, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 22, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 20, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2019SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance