Drawing for G GOLDHEIT

USPTO serial 79265306

G GOLDHEIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 6061121Status 739Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 26, 2020
Examiner
MISCHLER, MEGAN
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Need help with G GOLDHEIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $425

Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kimberly A. Berger

Kimberly A. Berger Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C150 West Jefferson, Ste. 2500Detroit, MI 48226United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics; cosmetic preparations for skincare; skin care preparations, namely, body balm; cosmetic creams for skin care; anti-aging skincare preparations, namely, anti-aging skincare cream; smoothing emulsions for the skin; non-medicated skin care lotions; ethereal essences for skin care; wrinkle removing skin care preparations; skin toners; exfoliate creams for the care of the skin; cleansing milks for skin careACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2026NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2026C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 10, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 28, 2026ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 26, 2025REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Oct 8, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2020FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 22, 2020FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 22, 2020FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 26, 2020FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 26, 2020R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 10, 2020NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2020PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 7, 2020GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 19, 2020OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Feb 19, 2020OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 19, 2020NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 31, 2020CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 28, 2020XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2020GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2020GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 28, 2020CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 8, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 8, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2020TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2019RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 19, 2019RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 19, 2019RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 3, 2019MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Aug 30, 2019RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 29, 2019CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 28, 2019DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 28, 2019NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 15, 2019REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance